Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mhmm. I have yet to see a DocBook output which looks decent (in the
> sense of good typography) without postprocessing. Maybe I've seen
> only bad examples so far -- can you point me to something?
Um...the print version of "The Art of Unix Programming"? I thought that
came out pretty well.
> > > > (And brace yourselves for the *real* political bunfight, which
> > > > is when I try to kill off GNU info...)
> > >
> > > You could have an ally ... !
> >
> > Next year :-).
>
> Hehe. What's your main argument against texinfo?
I don't have any desire to kill off Texinfo, actually. It's
overelaborate and old-school presentational, and moving the Jargon
File from it to DocBook was a wonderful thing, But it can survive
as a composition format without getting in the way.
It's info files as a delivery mechanism that I want to kill off. For
on-line browsing, Texinfo content should just merge into the rest of
the webby goodness instead of being its own weird little ghetto.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
