Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I asked this some 6 weeks ago but got no answers. hoping that the mail
maybe reaches some other list members this time I dare to repeat my
question:
I haven't forgotten your email, but I wasn't able to immediately
response, and it moved deeper and deeper into my cueue of unanswered
emails (which contains 350 emails, unfortunately). It's always a good
thing to send a reminder!
well, I did'nt want to get on anyones nerves...
refer:./test:4: nothing to reference (probably `bibliography' before
`sort')
this occurs if the document `test' contains the directive
.R1
accumulate
.R2
but does _not_ include references.
As I recall, this warning was implemented because, in a previous
release, placing the bibliography command before any other commands
caused a segmentation fault. The behavior was fixed: no segfault,
but when these commands are out of order, no output is produced,
which was presumably not the intended result - hence the warning.
Exactly. Please provide a small example document which exhibits the
annoying behaviour you observe. Maybe I can implement a fix.
please see the attachment and process with
`groff -R -ms refer_warn.trf'.
this should reproduce the warning.
Werner
regards,
joerg
.R1
accumulate
.R2
.LP
abc die katze lief im schnee.
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
