> I think the manual should be maintained seperately and simply as a
> basic reference, refering to the info file for more complicated or
> detailed information.
Yes. groff(7) aims to be complete and should be exactly that.
> The first thing to do would be to setup an organized structure of
> what we want in the groff info manual, then rearrange what we have
> to fit in that structure, then add content to complete the
> structure.
Suggestions, please.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
