On 10/20/05, Larry Kollar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, somehow my entire reply got deleted before I sent it (my copy in > "Sent" is also blank). > > Michael Smith wanted to know if anyone ever thought about a utility > to translate XSL:FO to groff. My opinion is that it would be better > to skip the translation to FO and go straight to groff, for several > reasons:
Those are exactly what I meant to say yesterday in a different thread when I spoke of making groff a back end for SGML and XML output transforms. The open source tools are there, they just don't have the output drivers. -- Alejandro López-Valencia _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
