On Tue Jun 21 00:32:15 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Okay, I'm seriously confused here, [...] > > I hope that my other mail helps you to understand the problem.
Yes, it did. Thanks. ... > > Anyway, that isn't as important as I thought. What I /know/ to be > > different in CVS groff compared to older releases is that evaluating > > PO before the first .LP zeros it, causing this zero-margin effect. > > Yes, this has been changed, namely by Egil: > > 2004-07-27 Egil Kvaleberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * tmac/s.tmac ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Don't save `PO' register. > (pg*end-col, pg*end-page): Directly use `PO' register. > > I've CCed him -- I no longer know the exact reason. I think I was involved last time we looked at -ms and PO, but I must admit that I no longer remember the details. They are also in the mailing list archives, I think. What I /do/ remember is that the previous PO (mis)feature was more serious and harder to work around than the current one, so I'm still happy. /Jörgen -- // Jörgen Grahn "Koka lopplummer, bada Ross, loppor borta." \X/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Jonas _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
