Got it Thanks
> On Feb 8, 2017, at 9:03 AM, Jochen Schalanda <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Rayees, > > On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 18:00:05 UTC+1, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > I am looking extractor configuration, there i am not seeing any way to define > the input, without this all the messages comes to system will go trough the > extractor right ? I am missing something ? > > Extractors are logically bound to inputs. You can create an (almost) > arbitrary number of inputs in Graylog for each special case. > > Cheers, > Jochen > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Graylog Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/graylog2/ec04c1d9-e2be-4c97-9b42-4d0c7e9eb079%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/graylog2/ec04c1d9-e2be-4c97-9b42-4d0c7e9eb079%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Graylog Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/graylog2/44A2EB03-756D-4DD9-AEEE-5B20F27E1F7D%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
