after a week it happened again. no idea why now.

the only error i've in the server.log is the following

2017-01-03T15:14:16.248+01:00 ERROR [ContentPackLoaderPeriodical] Couldn't
list content packs
java.nio.file.NoSuchFileException: data/contentpacks
    at
sun.nio.fs.UnixException.translateToIOException(UnixException.java:86)
~[?:1.8.0_102]
    at
sun.nio.fs.UnixException.rethrowAsIOException(UnixException.java:102)
~[?:1.8.0_102]
    at
sun.nio.fs.UnixException.rethrowAsIOException(UnixException.java:107)
~[?:1.8.0_102]
    at
sun.nio.fs.UnixFileSystemProvider.newDirectoryStream(UnixFileSystemProvider.java:427)
~[?:1.8.0_102]
    at java.nio.file.Files.newDirectoryStream(Files.java:525) ~[?:1.8.0_102]
    at
org.graylog2.periodical.ContentPackLoaderPeriodical.getFiles(ContentPackLoaderPeriodical.java:214)
[graylog.jar:?]
    at
org.graylog2.periodical.ContentPackLoaderPeriodical.doRun(ContentPackLoaderPeriodical.java:121)
[graylog.jar:?]
    at org.graylog2.plugin.periodical.Periodical.run(Periodical.java:77)
[graylog.jar:?]
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) [?:1.8.0_102]

but it does not seems tobe related with the cpu issue.

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Stefano Tranquillini <
stefano.tranquill...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I may have found (so far 1 day without the problem) the problem, i had the
> zencast enabled in the conf.
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Stefano Tranquillini <
> stefano.tranquill...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> To explain better:
>> i've two phisical servers on which we manage VMs
>> server A has 12 VMs, server B has 6 VMs. Graylog is 1 VMs on both, and
>> receives data from 1 VMs. same amount of memory and space.
>> Both graylog version are Graylog 2.1.1+01d50e5, installed pretty much
>> the same day.
>> configuration wise it the same, if there's anything in particular that I
>> should check out pls let me know. There's nothing special, just 1 single
>> input (UDP) with a JSON extractor. 8 indices retetion of 1week time.
>> the only thing is that the server with 30% has a slightly more traffic,
>> but not so much to have such a high cpu..
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Jochen Schalanda <joc...@graylog.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Stefano,
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 3 January 2017 14:15:23 UTC+1, Stefano Tranquillini wrote:
>>>>
>>>> any idea? it keeps replicating the behaviour and I don't get why.
>>>>
>>>
>>> what does "pretty much the same load and configuration" mean exactly?
>>> What do the logs of both Graylog nodes say?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Jochen
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>> Google Groups "Graylog Users" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/to
>>> pic/graylog2/GS5rJubNRBg/unsubscribe.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>> graylog2+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms
>>> gid/graylog2/89cff080-be1b-446f-84b7-74db52b4fd25%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/graylog2/89cff080-be1b-446f-84b7-74db52b4fd25%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Stefano
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Stefano
>



-- 
Stefano

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Graylog Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to graylog2+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/graylog2/CAPQ1%3DkB9C4i5No15%2BnJ1nQZjoMRYuRwbOrQ%3DkqmcRHJ56rCZtw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to