With that open issue resolved, I think you're good to go. Thanks for all of your hard work on sorting this out!
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:25 AM James Graham via governance < governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote: > On 19/06/2019 14:58, Andrew McCreight wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 8:52 AM James Graham via governance > > <governance@lists.mozilla.org <mailto:governance@lists.mozilla.org>> > wrote: > > > > Note that mozbase is a little special in the above proposal in that > it > > doesn't have an overall owner. This is because there isn't any one > > person who feels they have an understanding of the many > > subcomponents in > > mozbase, but making each its own module in the module system seemed > > like > > overkill. > > > > > > Modules should still have an owner. An owner doesn't need to understand > > every piece of code they are responsible for. They just need to know who > > knows about the different pieces, if anybody, and is willing to defer > > decisions to those other people as needed. > > > > gbrown has agreed to take overall ownership of mozbase, so consider that > added to the proposal. > > I'm not sure what else is needed to make progress here? > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > governance@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
