I have mixed feelings about this, and I think it's good to have this 
discussion.  I was surprised at the announcement, because it seemed sudden and 
unexpected.  Did I miss something, or was the discussion entirely internal to 
Mozilla (or on a bugzilla page, not something outsiders would typically 
discover on their own)?

I was also surprised because it is a proprietary service integrated into a Free 
Software product.  There were blog posts talking about how "Save" needs to be 
integrated across products, devices, and the Internet.  But "Save" was not 
integrated here--Pocket was, a proprietary service, a single web site.

It seems to me that an outcome more in-line with Mozilla's stated mission would 
be to publish a save-for-later API, integrate it into Firefox Sync, and make it 
possible for Firefox users to point their browsers' built-in save-for-later 
list at third-party services that implement the API.  It could even become a 
federated API, potentially integrating the variety of incompatible 
read-it-later-type services that exist.

There are, after all, already Free Software implementations of Pocket-like 
services (e.g. Poche).  It seems contrary to Mozilla's stated mission to tie in 
to a proprietary service instead of furthering the creation of open APIs and 
platforms.

Imagine a certain web site or service released a new, JSON-based protocol that 
combined HTTP, HTML, AJAX, maybe XUL or XSLT-type stuff, and released a Firefox 
extension that let people access its site or services more quickly than using 
HTTP/HTML/AJAX.  Now fast-forward a few years and it's very popular (maybe it's 
something like Netflix, and it lets them implement their UI more easily, or 
lock it down more than an HTML UI).  Would Mozilla then integrate it directly 
into Firefox?  It seems like the principle is the same.

I write all this as a long-time Firefox user, and one who's used Pocket since 
early in its Read-It-Later incarnation.  As much as I use it, it doesn't seem 
appropriate to integrate it directly into Firefox.  

And when viewed together with the EME situation, the trend toward integrating 
proprietary software and services is also concerning.  It can always be 
rationalized with lines like, "Our users are going to use it, one way or 
another, so we might as well integrate it," but if that had been Mozilla's 
attitude from the beginning, I don't think we would be here using Firefox 
today.  It seems like Mozilla is prioritizing users' short-term good over the 
long-term.
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to