Thanks for the tip Lofi -- I don't know about vertispan, but looks like a great option for us to check out!
On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 11:15:19 AM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote: > If you need a fast solution I would recommend to use professional help > like Vertispan: https://www.vertispan.com > > Colin knows the transpiler inside out 😉 > > @Jens: thanks for your debugging tips, I would add your tips to my GWT > deck. > [email protected] schrieb am Sonntag, 4. Oktober 2020 um 05:16:11 UTC+2: > >> Thanks Jens, I did what you asked and have the following in the debugger: >> >> [image: Screen Shot 2020-10-03 at 8.11.01 PM.png] >> >> [image: Screen Shot 2020-10-03 at 8.11.17 PM.png] >> >> What do you make of this? >> >> I don't see any duplicate GWT on the classpath (project is a pretty >> simple maven setup). >> >> Thanks, >> Aaron >> >> On Friday, October 2, 2020 at 4:31:37 AM UTC-7 Jens wrote: >> >>> And there you have it... absolutely no idea why it's malfunctioning in >>>> this way. Any help is greatly appreciated! >>>> >>> >>> Ok in sourcemaps it looks indeed a bit weird. However there will be >>> additional JS code executed to convert java.lang.Integer into a primitive >>> int which is represented by JS number. That conversion seems to produce >>> undefined. >>> >>> Please use newest GWT SDK and either launch SuperDevMode or GWT compiler >>> with these additional command line parameters: "-strict -style PRETTY >>> -XmethodNameDisplayMode ABBREVIATED". >>> >>> When doing so you make sure that no compile issue will be skipped >>> (-strict), your JS code will be more readable (-style PRETTY) and you can >>> more easily search for Java method names in the generated JS code >>> (-XmethodName...). Next you should disable JS Source Maps support in Chrome >>> Dev Tools to see the JS code. >>> To find the above method you would search the JS for >>> "AbstractSerializationStreamWriter.addString" and should find a JS line >>> that sets a displayName property. Above that line you will find the method >>> implementation. >>> >>> In the typical case to convert java.lang.Integer to primitive int, GWT >>> should have generated JS that calls the intValue() method of Integer. >>> >>> >>> If something looks weird you might also want to double check that you do >>> not have multiple versions of GWT in class path. That sometimes happened >>> people when upgrading GWT and also using a bunch of third party libraries. >>> Sometimes 3rd party libraries also emulate JRE classes which then do not >>> match the JRE emulation in GWT SDK. This can be an additional possibility >>> for unexpected JS behavior. >>> >>> >>> -- J. >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/e5ead537-b1d1-4b0f-b38e-cbef1afb6baan%40googlegroups.com.
