> Hope you can come up with something realistic... Clearly Google think they already have, and it is already in place.
One way to encourage re-think is to provide a concrete alternative. We don't have access to the numbers (users, hits, etc.) to see how a suggestion pans out, but if a suggestion is made it should be easy enough for Google to do sums. It might be most effective to present such a suggestion with an estimate of the results, compared to the status quo. Most likely the wrong Google folk are reading this forum, but if the message is more persuasive than "poor me" and more like "benefits to Google", I'm sure it would get passed upwards. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
