Thanks Ben,

After some more tests, the behaviour in Firefox should be defined as
"undefined".
I have tried assigning by own, arbitrarily defined, zindex scheme ...
and all works as desired.

Thanks for all of the constructive help given.

On Feb 1, 1:13 pm, Ben Appleton <apple...@google.com> wrote:
> Right; if you want to robustly control the placement of your markers you
> should specify a zIndex for each.
>
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, sgiddings <mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I mention this because, in Firefox, I can access the z-index correctly
> > through getZIndex and thus place my flag "behind" the poi marker.
>
> > Following your remarks, does this mean that I can create my own "z-
> > index" values, ie starting from 0, without the risk of having markers
> > badly positioned in the hierarchy ?
>
> > On Feb 1, 11:54 am, Ben Appleton <apple...@google.com> wrote:
> > > It is intended that you cannot access the final zIndex that has been
> > > assigned to the marker. The final zIndex assigned by the API is subject
> > to
> > > change as it depends on the underlying implementation. You can access the
> > > zIndex that you set, which is undefined in this case.
>
> > > This behavior is consistent between browsers. Why do you mention IE in
> > the
> > > title of your post?
>
> > > You will find this group much more helpful if you post a link to a site
> > that
> > > replicates the issue.
>
> > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:06 AM, sgiddings <mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > After having made deeper investigation, I discover that, when markers
> > > > are inserted into the display, they are given a z-index within the
> > > > style attribute of the container div.
> > > > Here is an example of what is generated within IEv8 by simply creating
> > > > a marker and NOT calling setZIndex :
>
> > > > <div style="z-index: 24; position: absolute; filter: alpha(opacity=1);
> > > > width: 32px; height: 37px; overflow: hidden; top: -13px; cursor:
> > > > pointer; left: 373px" class=gmnoprint title="">...</div>
>
> > > > When I call the method getZIndex, should it not therefore return the
> > > > value indicated in the z-index css style ?
> > > > Is there a correct means to be able to access the div DOM element to
> > > > query for this value within the attributes property ?
>
> > > > On Feb 1, 10:15 am, sgiddings <mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > For Paulo -
> > > > > It is obvious that you have not taken the time to correctly
> > understand
> > > > > my post.
> > > > > I indicate two aspects - the site is still in DEV, therefore not
> > > > > visible, so no demo !
> > > > > Secondly, the information given was sufficiently detailed and clear
> > > > > permitting Rossko to give a very pertinent reply.
> > > > > Try better next time.
>
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > For Rossko,
>
> > > > > Thankyou for your helpful reply.
> > > > > Indeed I had noticed a number of questions going around about this
> > > > > subject, but had not picked up on this aspect.
> > > > > You are right, I do not set the zIndex of the poi markers beforehand.
> > > > > Indeed I cannot see how this could be possible as, in IE, I would not
> > > > > be able to determine the correct starting index.
> > > > > Yet again more cross browser dev headaches.
>
> > > > > On Jan 31, 9:48 pm, Rossko <ros...@culzean.clara.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > However, in IE v8, the call to Marker.getZIndex always returns
> > > > > > > undefined.
> > > > > > > Has anyone else come across this problem?
>
> > > > > > It's been mentioned in this group before that it only returns a
> > > > > > meaningful value if you have previously defined it using setZIndex.
> > > > > > Without the context of seeing your code in action, can't say if
> > that
> > > > > > is relevant.
>
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > > google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-maps-js-api-v3%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> > <google-maps-js-api-v3%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-maps-js-api-v3%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>
> > > > .
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
> > google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-maps-js-api-v3%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.

Reply via email to