On Jul 14, 12:13 am, Ben Appleton <[email protected]> wrote: > No plans at this point. How would JSON would be any more useful than raw > KML? Afterall you can load the KML directly into the browser, parsing and > modifying it as you wish. What JSON schema would we use?
It would eliminate the proxy requirement. JSON is a much more compact format than KML / XML. It is directly executable. It does not require a separate parsing step. Extraneous elements could be ignored. The reasons are similar to the reasons to split the direction service. If I could legally use your "gx" or "sf" service today, I would. The two services seem to be identical. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
