Oh very cool!  It looks like the secret sauce is in the "
internalResourceViewResolver()" method?  I will give this a try this
coming week.  Thanks for the helping hand!
-Todd


On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 1:11 PM pravanjan palai <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello Todd,
>     I have created a sample example with Java 11 with Spring Boot war type
> and successfully tested. Please follow this  Github link
> <https://github.com/pravanjan/springboot-appengine-java11> for complete
> detail. Do let me know if it works for you.
>
> Thanks,
> Pravanjan
>
> On Tuesday, August 4, 2020 at 11:58:36 PM UTC+5:30 [email protected]
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone!
>>
>> The story so far...
>>
>>    - I built a little web app using Spring Boot with old-school JSP
>>    pages using Java 11, which runs fine locally
>>    - Note that Spring Boot appears to only officially support JSP with
>>    WAR packaging
>>    - My web app provides functionality that will only get used a few
>>    times a week (sounds like GAE Standard Environment would be perfect!)
>>    - I spent quite a lot of time trying to get GAE Standard deployment
>>    to to work with a WAR file (I failed)
>>    - I spent quite a lot of time trying to get Spring Boot with JSP
>>    working packaged as a JAR (I failed)
>>    - In the end, I gave up, containerized it with Docker, and deployed
>>    it to the GAE Flexible Environment instead (where it is now, working)
>>
>> The usage profile of my little web app makes MUCH more sense in Standard
>> environment and would save me $ that way.  Maybe if I...
>>
>>    - Gave up on Java 11 and reverted to Java 8 I could get GAE Standard
>>    to accept a WAR file?
>>    - Gave up on Spring Boot and/or JSP and used some other framework /
>>    technology for my web app I could package as a JAR?
>>
>> I was hoping someone might have some insight they'd be willing to share.
>> Does anyone know a trick to get GAE Standard to take a WAR or get Spring
>> Boot + JSP working in a JAR?  Can WARs really be made to work if I
>> downgrade to Java 8?  I just hate the idea of throwing money away on an
>> ever-present instance that will only get used for a couple of hours a week,
>> but other directions to try carry significant dev time.  Any ideas?  I'm
>> hoping I've just missed something obvious.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -Todd
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/c764819b-8f1d-46a0-8f29-65a79efdc00dn%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/c764819b-8f1d-46a0-8f29-65a79efdc00dn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/CAOowzusHDKoX%2BiSVnQkJdjCFZ4Ur1e8Ovcam5o6EJ00HpgThQA%40mail.gmail.com.
  • [google-app... Todd Murchison
    • [googl... 'George (Cloud Platform Support)' via Google App Engine
      • Re... Todd Murchison
        • ... 'Alexis (Google Cloud Platform Support)' via Google App Engine
          • ... Ronoaldo Pereira
    • [googl... RĂ©mi Bastide
    • [googl... pravanjan palai
      • Re... Todd Murchison

Reply via email to