GCP's "always free" tier, see https://cloud.google.com/free/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=na-US-all-en-dr-bkws-all-all-trial-b-dr-1002250&utm_content=text-ad-none-any-DEV_c-CRE_201398096598-ADGP_BKWS+%7C+Multi+~+null_Google+Cloud+Free+Tier-KWID_43700021847830863-kwd-299036639748&utm_term=KW_google%20cloud%20free%20tier-ST_google+cloud+free+tier&dclid=CM7d_7Wt3NUCFcgHgQod-YgGkw , includes 28 hours per day of instance hours, so if only one small instance of the app is serving, it's free.
*However*, this applies to App Engine's *Standard* runtime, *not* the *Flex* one you're specifying. The main difference for your use case seems to be that Standard does not currently support nodejs -- just Python, Go, Java, and PHP. If this is a blocker for you, then I fear we don't currently have an always-free App Engine Flex solution (just App Engine Standard and Compute Engine). Alex On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Bishop Zareh <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am very familiar with Compute Engine, but rather new to App Engine. > > My students currently use Heroku for the apps they build during the > semester. They are able to create a free premeptable instance, which is > perfect because they are the only person using the app. I would like to > have them use GCP instead of the Heroku. > > I setup a fist test app on App Engine, and the bill unexpectedly came out > to $15 for the first week. I stopped it and tried a new app with these > app.yaml settings: > > runtime: nodejs > env: flex > > instance_class: B1 > > manual_scaling: > instances: 1 > > resources: > cpu: 0.01 > memory_gb: 0.5 > disk_size_gb: 0.1 > > health_check: > enable_health_check: False > > As near as I could tell from the documentation that is the least expensive > App Engine app that is possible. With this configuration the price came > down to $7 per week. > > That is still too much for students to use. Once their $300 runs out, they > will be paying an exorbanate amount of money to keep their coding examples > online despite the extremely low traffic they utilize. > > Is there a way to make a cheaper App Engine app? > > They could create a preemptable compute instance for less money, but they > seems like a lot of overhead for such a simple usage. > > Any help appreciation, > BishopZ > > http://bishopz.com > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/google-appengine/42db5f6a-25b3-435d-9e53- > beb06daa3e89%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/42db5f6a-25b3-435d-9e53-beb06daa3e89%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/CAE46Be-d9Fk02A8pXEMniKhXQyrb%3Dp3D-B3dRoLqJrmYXv4o1Q%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
