We currently have a Python App which basically does nothing more than receive 4000 request a day, and in halve of this requests decides to lookup a single key_name in datastore and update the data record (350 bytes) or insert it. (NB: The app is able to do a lot more thing, but we are currently only using the other functionality only for very few requests (< 200) in testing).
Running this app with "always on" (because else we had lots of timeout errors during app loading) resulted in 6 concurrent instances so would cost 5* 57,60=288 USD per month with new pricing. Current cost is 9 USD per month. 288 USD would buy 57 reserved Amazon EC2 Micro instance (each of which has 3 times the amount of RAM AppEngine has) or 13 reserved Amazon EC2 Small instances (each of which had 8 the amount of RAM AppEngine has). I would think that 2 EC2 instances of any type should be enough to handle a lot more load and have redundancy) Do you think that the pricing is correct? Do you think that your scheduler is running correct? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/oRQHZiqa1d8J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
