+1. Very sensible and appengine like.
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Dale <[email protected]> wrote: > According to Ikai and other Googlers a very real cost to GAE is the > memory consumption of apps that don't use a lot of CPU but still have > active instances. > > So why not add a charge for memory usage x time? If one instance used > 20 MB for 24 hours it would consume 480 MB.hours. > > Instance.hours hides behind an opaque scheduler. I prefer the > granularity of the existing billing system: It's easier to know where > to spend development time optimising code, and what the payoff is > likely to be. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
