Thanks for your answer but I wanted to know the actual value of delays incurred while accessing the data store for reads and that by memcache
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Didier Durand <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > If you don't use memcache, it means that you do your reads from > datastore, so you incur the delay of accessing a remote datastore > server and then the delay of its disk access time. > > Memcache is direct access memory so much faster! > > You see most of the benefits if you can use memcache for piece of data > that you very frequently use throughout your application. > > regards > > didier > > On Apr 14, 8:26 am, Meet Mehta <[email protected]> wrote: > > what are the performance statistics of using mem cache and not using it > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine for Java" group. > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
