Thanks Bill
    I have experience with hibernate thats why i thought it could be
possible.

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Bill Milligan <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> I believe you're going to have to change this to
>
> class User {
> String name;
> List <String> workNames; // or List <Long> workIds;
> }
>
> class Work {
> String name;
> String userName; // or Long userId;
> }
>
> This is actually you'd design this under the MDA paradigm, actually.  You
> need to be able to change each independently of the other.  As far as
> "automatic population", like an ORM would do, I don't think this is
> possible.  You'll have to do this manually.  Honestly, you won't lose much
> by doing two queries.
>
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:12 PM, RAVINDER MAAN <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thank you so much for your answer Bill
>>     yes you are rite the way i wrote its many to many relation.Actually I
>> want relation as below
>>
>> class User{
>> Long id;
>> String username;
>> List<Work> workList;
>> }
>>
>> class Work{
>> Long id;
>> String workname;
>> String username;
>>
>> }
>>    you can see work class has username and user class too has username.In
>> both classes primary key is id. I just want to know is there any way to get
>> workList populated automatically on retrieval of user object.we can do it
>> with 2 queries easily.we can reteriev user first then we can retrieve work
>> object with second query.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Bill Milligan 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Are you trying one-to-many or many-to-many?  By using a third table it
>>> sounds like you're trying to do many-to-many, not one-to-many.
>>>
>>> As best I can determine, the only real way to do this in GAE is to have a
>>> User class with a collection of string properties, containing the list of
>>> all Work ids.  In this case a bidirectional link would be probably quite
>>> useful, so that a Work could be identified by its User id.
>>>
>>> Here's a scenario:  Retrieve User by user id.  Then, retrieve all Works
>>> in the list of work ids owned by the User.
>>>
>>> Note that this is not true object composition, with a User containing a
>>> List of Collection, but rather an indirect reference.  This pattern is
>>> useful in a lot of circumstances where you want to be able to break up your
>>> object model into more modular deployable applications.  On the other hand,
>>> I'd hate to be completely boxed in by this restriction.
>>>
>>> I'm just getting started with GAE so I'm very much not an expert.  I'd
>>> love to know anybody else's thoughts on the matter.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:10 AM, RAVINDER MAAN <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello all
>>>>   can anybody please tell me how to implement simple one many
>>>> relation in java.I have user table and work table .Any user can do
>>>> many type of works.In user table i have userid but it is not primary
>>>> key of the user table.Then i have work table which has workid it is
>>>> also not primary key of the table.Normally in relation db we ca make
>>>> third table table which contains workid for every userid.What how can
>>>> we implement this thing appengine datastore.I want to have collection
>>>> all works in user object .can anybody please tell me how to define
>>>> this mapping?please note that in userid and workid are not primary
>>>> keys in both objects or tables.
>>>> Thanks in adavance.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected]<google-appengine-java%[email protected]>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<google-appengine-java%[email protected]>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Ravinder Singh Maan
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<google-appengine-java%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<google-appengine-java%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>



-- 
Regards,
Ravinder Singh Maan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.

Reply via email to