Ton Hospel wrote: > > In article <aregpp$aq8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ton Hospel) writes: > > And yet another TPR is finished... > > > > Rick, Stephen: 54.563 > > Jeff: 54.559 > > > > Oops, correction: > > Rick, Stephen: 54.559 > Jeff: 54.563
Am I the only one who has a slight problem with classifying positions using a more accurate score than is displayed in the leaderboard? I wasn't able to read my golf mail last week, and wasn't able to tell who was in the lead. Jeff may also have been in this position, if he's even subscribed to the list. If I were Jeff, I think I'd feel a little put out at being classified third. (I don't particularly care about me being fifth instead of fourth - a miss is as good as a mile, whatever that means). On the whole though, I enjoyed this golf (primarily because I put relatively little time into it, and still did far better than I've done ofr ages!). I found it very similar to the earlier anagram golf, too, in that almost everyone had the same solution, it was just a matter of doing the little things 'right'. Thank goodness Ton gave us two methods, though, because I was on 90-odd for the other method. Thanks to refs, and looking forward to next month! Jasper (who's just not back from an abandoned due to food poisoning trip to Texas)