--- Ton Hospel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Rick Klement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > .... .... > > .... ... > > ... .... > > .. ... > > . .. > > > > there is a node name '....' that is both in a relationship and is > included > > as an "isolated" node. I believe that is legal. > > > duh ? But then it's not isolated ! Seems pretty weird to rule this > valid. > Anyways, whatever you do, this deserves a rules update.
Indeed. To be honest, if you do look at the thing as a strict '<' relationship rather than a '<=' relationship, then _any_ "x x" rule signifies an impossible situation, and therefore the isolated nodes themselves are invalid, and instantly die-able. Phil ===== -- "One cannot delete the Web browser from KDE without losing the ability to manage files on the user's own hard disk." - Prof. Stuart E Madnick, MIT. So called "expert" witness for Microsoft. 2002/05/02 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
