On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 01:22:07PM +0100, Jonathan E. Paton wrote:
> > > Wouldn't it be better if you used something like Genie,
> > > which sents instant messages to phones?  
> > 
> >     Oh. I could. Easily. 
> >     
> >     The question, though, is do peoples want me to spam their
> > cell phone, or do they prefer to access the url when the fancy strikes
> > them. Somehow, I assumed everyone (well, anyone who cares) would prefer
> > the second option. But if some of you really want to receive 
> > a phone call each time your rank slip down the leaderboard, I
> > would be more than happy to provide the service. :)
> 
> Here in the United Kindom, companies charge over the odds for WAP internet.
> The price equates to roughly $0.14USD per minute, which on my phone/provider
> typically is a VERY unresponsive WAP experience.
<snip>
> I much prefer push technology (i.e. messages), just summerising just how
> far you're behind.  Then you'd know whether to bother searching deeper via
> WML/WAP.

        I have to look at this. I've (very quickly) glanced over Genie, 
and it seems it requires for the sender to have an account with them,
and that you have a max. amount of messages that can be send per
month. 

        In all cases, if I decide to go that way, would you accept
to be my guinea pig? :)

> Anyway, wouldn't it be cool if PGAS allowed WAP submissitions?  

        Well, you can already do that by typing your solution directly 
in the url. :)

        But, again, I have to look further into what cell phones have
to offer. Which is kinda hard, considering I have no cell phone
or friends that have one...


Joy,
`/anick

-- 
Life is change. Growth is optional. Choose wisely.
                             -- Karen Kaiser Clark

Reply via email to