In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Stefan `Sec` Zehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 09:22:11PM +0000, Ton Hospel wrote:
>> the accumulator must be a string so you get magic ++
>> If you let it go from undef, it's a numeric ++
>
> Oh. How embarrassing. I totally missed the point of why these solutions even
> work :(. I think I should stop staring at the post mortem and go to bed.
>
Hehe, it's even worse in my 60 solution, where the ++ switches from
magical to numeric and back during each loop
