Dave Hoover wrote: > > Speaking of prizes, I don't think we'll have much of a problem with > that going forward...we just secured O'Reilly as a sponsor! With > both ORA and ActiveState contributing prizes (bumper stickers, t- > shirts, and *books*)starting next month, we'll probably need a new > category! :-)
Yay! Well done, refs! > It sounds like everyone is OK with teams. They will be added for > TPR(0,3). > > So, can anyone think of any team-category-specific rules that we > will need to clarify? It would be good form for teams to put the number of members in their team name, like "Team JABOPH (4)" I think the order of the leaderboard is relevent. Right now, Vets first and Beginners second emphasizes the fact that the former board is expected to beat the latter, which is the right thing to do. It is unclear to me, however, whether the Team board would be better placed before the Vets board (signifying that super-low scores are paramount) or after the beginners (signifying that individual achievement is more commendable than group achievement). Or maybe the boards should be displayed in order of lowest scores. It doesn't *really* matter, but since we're talking about such things... Chris
