Stephen wrote: >On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Keith C. Ivey wrote: >> >> I've got 29 also, but this is a problem that gives a huge >> advantage to people who've seen a certain famous (at least >> among the sort of people who read FWP) solution for finding >> primes. > >Ah, I didn't realise that it was well known. Well, it should amuse those >people who haven't seen it before anyway.
I've got it down to 46. I am being amused. :-) Maybe I should do a Google search on "famous prime algorithm"! --Dave
