How to objectively distinguish between BOT contribution and none BOT contributions ? It looks like an open door to arbitrary discrimination.
Note also that there may be bad human contributors and valuable BOT contributions. The real problem is the cost of reviewing the quality of contributions to sort out the bad ones. The Brandolini law (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law) comes in effect. I thus strongly disagree to reject contributions just because they're are made by BOTs or AI. First because it will become more and more difficult to decide which one is which, and second this does not efficiently pushes toward the real goal which is to enhance the quality of the contribution and the product. Le samedi 14 février 2026 à 08:07:02 UTC+1, [email protected] a écrit : > This post <https://groups.google.com/g/golang-nuts/c/9faUzoP_JgM> by an > AI BOT (along with the +1 below and the repo behind) is utter spam and of > disgusting low quality. > I find crap from BOTs whether in the form of posts, comments, or PRs an > insult, and a genuine attack on our community. > > While the BOT issue here in go-nuts is still relatively mild, and I > understand the Go team may not have much resources to spare on this mostly > unofficial forum, I'd like to raise this issue proactively before it's too > late. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/b677045d-ab66-4150-9f30-7c987e87eb85n%40googlegroups.com.
