Because the stdlib generic map is not 1) an interface (e.g. cannot have concurrent semantics with same syntax ) and 2) cannot work with arbitrary types - they must implement comparable.
I thought this was obvious from the discussion. > On Jun 26, 2025, at 1:55 AM, Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 8:30 AM Robert Engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> Agreed. I’ve been away from Go for a bit - I just assumed with hash/maphash >> the stdlib had a generic map… ugh. > > Why should the _stdlib_ have a generic map when the _language_ had a > generic map since it went public in 2009? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/C2207B90-3144-46DF-9227-F283331895AA%40ix.netcom.com.
