Re: [go-nuts] Guaranteeing deterministic execution of Golang code

[Robert Engels]

Not my observation - it’s in the Go docs :) On May 26, 2025, at 2:51 PM, Jason E. Aten <j.e.a...@gmail.com> wrote: Interesting observation, thanks Robert!  I'll have to think about that more. Off the cuff, I don't think they mutually exclusive. Randomness might benefit liveness  properties too/not just a safety ones. On Monday, May 26, 2025 at 12:58:17 PM UTC+1 Robert Engels wrote: I am pretty sure that isn’t correct. You can still easily create deadlocks. The reason it is random is to avoid channel starvation.  -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/b4b79ae2-cd7f-4c6e-b8b1-f1e5b730a31bn%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/161E40CD-323E-4DC4-A3CC-687820B8553E%40ix.netcom.com.