This might be helpful https://dev.to/miketalbot/server-sent-events-are-still-not-production-ready-after-a-decade-a-lesson-for-me-a-warning-for-you-2gie
We had an SSE and abandoned it for WS - but we were high volume. > On Oct 23, 2024, at 9:48 AM, robert engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > A lot depends on the volume - you need back pressure support for high volume > events over the internet - and the built-in ping/pong of WS makes this > straightforward. I think it is pretty hard to do back pressure if > unidirectional as well (need side endpoints, etc.). > >> On Oct 23, 2024, at 9:44 AM, 'Zane Attahri' via golang-nuts >> <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote: >> >> Second this, and go ever further. >> >> If you don’t need bi-directional communication, SSE are almost always the >> better choice. Simpler to implement, standard, and easier to consume by >> non-browser clients. >> >>> On Oct 23, 2024, at 10:37 AM, Brian Hatfield <bmhatfi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I don't think it's quite so binary. Websockets are a lot more complex, >>> require more sophisticated endpoints and load balancing. SSE has fine >>> browser support in 2024, minus the ability to set auth headers. I think for >>> cases with unidirectional communication, SSE is a choice worth evaluating >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "golang-nuts" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/2A0061EB-36AA-472E-8B9D-81BBD0F779E0%40attahri.com. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/797096F1-5219-40BD-A382-AF79B435EAAB%40ix.netcom.com.
