On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 19:46, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 5:24 PM 'David Anderson' via golang-nuts > <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > > In practice, as you point out, the original Go implementation does the > > obvious thing and reuses the range iteration behavior. Would it be > > reasonable to nail down that `[]rune(foo)` must behave the same as range > > iteration in all implementations? > > It seems reasonable at first glance. Want to open an issue for this? > Or just send a patch? Thanks.
Sure, I'll send a patch in a bit, once I knock the rust off my gerrit knowledge. - Dave > > Ian > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > <mailto:golang-nuts%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAOyqgcUNpR_LUZWPiKg2VSoTFZn9_Moktho6uRT7Ru78O3qorQ%40mail.gmail.com. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/2533810b-ffd3-472c-b596-d9e7e2a2cfbb%40app.fastmail.com.
