On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 5:45 PM Will Faught <will.fau...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ian,refer> > I see. I'm concerned that approach wouldn't scale to the number of clean and > build flags there are. I count 8 clean flags and 10+ build flags. That would > look like: > > > go clean [-i] [-n] [-r] [-x] [-cache] [-testcache] [-modcache] [-fuzzcache] > > [-C dir] [-a] [-p n] [-race] [-msan] [-asan] [-cover] [-covermode > > set,count,atomic] [-coverpkg pattern1,pattern2,pattern3] ... > > That doesn't seem too useful.
Agreed, which is why I did not suggest expanding the build flags. I wrote exactly what I think the output "go clean -h" should be. We already don't expand the build flags in most of the "go CMD -h" output. Ian > On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 5:09 PM Ian Lance Taylor <i...@golang.org> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 12:03 AM Will Faught <will.fau...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Sure thing. >> > >> > Just want to make sure we're on the same page. We would be changing the >> > clean command help message to document its clean and build flags like the >> > flags package does: >> > >> > usage: go clean [clean flags] [build flags] [packages] >> > >> > -i remove the corresponding installed archive or binary (what 'go >> > install' would create) >> > -n print the remove commands it would execute, but not run them >> > -r apply recursively to all the dependencies of the packages named by >> > the import paths >> > -a >> > force rebuilding of packages that are already up-to-date. >> > -p n >> > the number of programs, such as build commands or >> > test binaries, that can be run in parallel. >> > The default is GOMAXPROCS, normally the number of CPUs available. >> > -race >> > enable data race detection. >> > Supported only on linux/amd64, freebsd/amd64, darwin/amd64, >> > darwin/arm64, windows/amd64, >> > linux/ppc64le and linux/arm64 (only for 48-bit VMA). >> > [...] >> > >> > Run 'go help clean' for details. >> > >> > The clean and build flags would be mixed together and ordered >> > alphabetically, like flags does. >> > >> > Does that look right? >> >> No, I was thinking of something different. The current pattern is >> that "go CMD -h" prints a short summary of the flags. For example >> >> > go fmt -h >> usage: go fmt [-n] [-x] [packages] >> Run 'go help fmt' for details. >> >> This is useful for a quick reminder for how to run the command, and >> shows people who need more information how to get more information. >> So I think "go clean -h" should print something like >> >> go clean [-i] [-r] [-cache] [-testcache] [-modcache] [-fuzzcache] >> [build flags] [packages] >> Run ' go help clean' for details >> >> >> >> Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAOyqgcWtVTZGNNmq%2B-cMZdyHs4caeyLGMfgW6RSfebz1vPKALQ%40mail.gmail.com.