I’m trying to compare the efficiency of two binaries before and after applying Profile-Guided Optimization . For this, I’m using Go’s profiling, specifically the flame graph. However, I’m getting two almost identical stacks; the only difference is that some functions are inlined. It seems that pprof doesn’t recognize that these functions are part of the same execution path. I need to understand the percentage of improvement I’m getting when compiling with PGO.
My question is: Is there a way to indicate to pprof that these two paths are part of the same execution? Or, is there a way to measure the improvement obtained with PGO?" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/11628d55-73c3-44e1-91bf-8fcc8adb1631n%40googlegroups.com.