Thanks
El mar, 6 feb 2024 a las 12:05, Ian Lance Taylor (<i...@golang.org>)
escribió:
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 6:43 AM Victor Manuel “Vitu” Giordano
> <vitucho3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm wondering why the language allow me to write something like this:
> >
> > type IncFunc func(a int) int
> >
> > type Incrementor interface {
> > IncFunc // <-- THIS is allowed
> > IncQuantity() int
> > }
> >
> > (RTR example here)
> >
> > I don't get how I can make leverage of that.. or if has any sense at all
> 🥴😵💫
> > As I recall an interface is a set of methods, and a method do have a
> name... the thing here is that the name if the name of the type not the
> function's name.
>
> An interface type like that can be used as a constraint for a type
> parameter. It can't be used as the type of a variable. As a type
> parameter constraint it means that the type argument must be IncFunc.
> It's fairly useless, but follows from the other rules about type
> parameter constraints.
>
> Ian
>
--
V
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAPUu9ssWofyST_KX3htbcR4aN09gi6MTr%2B9kBxmXaFEiFG6T2A%40mail.gmail.com.
