> Personally, I find "why" questions suspicious. They are usually thinly > disguised requests to change the existing behavior. And that appears to be > the case for this discussion. >
No, that's not to be the case, I do imagining the change, but am not thinking of requesting any change, I know the proper workflow of requesting change to Go lang spec, so if it comes down to me offering explanation as of the why the alternative behavior is better then it won't be a discussion here, it will be an RFC. In this case, I simply don't have the knowledge of Go design decisions and would like to know more about the details behind those decisions. Anyway, I'll stop here. Thank you for all the replies. -- regards, Nurahmadie -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CA%2BcQEWEX31BWJoF8ci4jFeKSJdT-szrvHNm4yfNDY2Hw_oUMxQ%40mail.gmail.com.
