Hi there, (Apologies if you get it twice, sent it from my CERN account) (Apologies for the belated answer, I am on holidays with patchy network coverage)
I had worked on this pure Go library to make the installation of Gophernotes (an IPython kernel for Go) easier (just go-get-able). It was also part of PoC for an IPC-based data acquisition system at CERN. (That didn't pan out: they weren't so inclined to have Go in their stack) Go-zeromq is robust enough for Gophernotes but is probably in need for some maintenance and development. I personally don't have time for that (but I can give the keys of the castle to motivated people). Cheers, Sebastien. Aug 23, 2023 18:26:41 Amnon <amno...@gmail.com>: > Apologies for reopening an ancient thread. > But what was the motivation for re-implementing zeroMQ in Go? > > I am asking because my company is proposing to add zeroMQ support to our code > using a CGO wrapper for libzmq. (Currently our product is pure Go). > What problems would should we expect if we decide to go down the CGO route? > > - Amnon > > On Thursday, 14 June 2018 at 08:30:39 UTC+1 Sokolov Yura wrote: >> Great! It is really long waited. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/8963f03a-f7f9-45e2-b235-ccce0be865d3n%40googlegroups.com[https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/8963f03a-f7f9-45e2-b235-ccce0be865d3n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer]. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/714c7dbf-7ad0-4db1-aa38-eff1bd36393c%40sbinet.org.
