Yes, I read through the thread -- but it seemed different (go work sync / go mod tidy). I'll follow up there then.
thanks! On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 7:10:53 PM UTC+2 Howard C. Shaw III wrote: > Such an issue is what I linked you to earlier in the thread. So I do not > think you need to create a new issue - however, in the comments in that > issue one of the devs asks for use cases where go work sync is not > sufficient, so you might want to reply to that with your example where go > work sync has not been sufficient. > > https://github.com/golang/go/issues/50750 > > Well, it is actually about go mod tidy, but the discussion mentions go get > as well, and is generally about why the other tools ignore go.work and > whether this should be changed. So I think it is the appropriate forum for > that discussion. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/a128fc26-e19f-4c68-8688-3054d01129ban%40googlegroups.com.
