I have some hair splitting question. In the "Conversions to and from a string type" we read: "Converting a signed or unsigned integer value to a string type yields a string containing the UTF-8 representation of the integer."
Would it be more corrected to say, that conversion from integer to string gives you UTF-8 representation of code point described by value of the integer? Or maybe it is indeed representation of integer described by UTF-8 specification? Best regards, Kamil czwartek, 28 października 2021 o 19:33:27 UTC+2 Kamil Ziemian napisał(a): > Hello, > > From what I understand proper Gopher read at least one time "The Go > Programming Language Specification" (https://golang.org/ref/spec) and now > I need to read it too. > > I learn something of Extended Backus-Naur Form to understand it, so if I > say something stupid beyond belief, I hope you will forgive me. In the > first part "Notation" (https://golang.org/ref/spec#Notation) I believe > that I understand meaning of all concepts except of "production_name". On > one hand "production_name" means that it is name of the production, not > rocket science here. On the other, after reading about EBNF I feel that I > should have more information about it. Can you explain it to me? > > Again I'm new to EBNF, so maybe this is stupid question. > > Best > Kamil > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/06347585-fd2c-4bfa-9527-3439389c6414n%40googlegroups.com.
