On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:03 AM Sam Vilain <s...@vilain.net> wrote: > > Looks like `math/bits` could use some assembly alternatives, too. Clever as > those functions are, they're almost certainly not going to beat the > microcode/silicon. I'm looking into the contribution guidelines now!
Note that many of the math/bits functions are actually implemented directly by the compiler. Check the final executable on your processors of interest. Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAOyqgcV45snwyMCXy8_HhcLjiqgi54DMLstR_hciKXdBGwFRow%40mail.gmail.com.
