That makes sense. Thanks for replying. regards On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 1:11:35 AM UTC+8 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 7:55 AM Xie Yuchen <xieyu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I checked with the issue about how to refer no-copy and the check of > cmd/vet. After checking, I'm curious that why not define mutex as an > interface, as interface always copy like a reference, which means users > don't worry to copy by value and cause an error. > > > > Design by the interface can always copy like a reference and no need to > mark it as cannot copy. However, we need to provide a default > implementation of the mutex and the construction of mutex is not short and > clean anymore. > > > > Would like to see how do you think about this confusion. > > That would mean that the zero value of sync.Mutex would not be usable. > > Ian > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/adffe982-b486-4187-9731-6147ec0bf436n%40googlegroups.com.
