Thanks for the very helpful replies. < go doc -all pkg > should meets my needs for printed documentation. I guess I will have to weigh the convenience of navigating which the godoc html version provides vs the inconvenience of "instantiating" the methods required by the types [T] I use in this project. The pkgsite option doesn't seem workable in my case for the reasons eloquently described by one of the posters to issue 49212. At any rate, problem solved and thanks again to the golang-nuts group for the assistance!
On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 9:32:09 AM UTC-4 Sebastien Binet wrote: > On Thu Nov 3, 2022 at 14:02 CET, Jan Mercl wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 12:49 PM Hotei <hote...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I added some generic code to a project and godoc doesn't seem to like > that and stops working when it sees the generics. It's a 4 year old version > of godoc so that's perhaps not a surprise. What is a surprise is that godoc > isn't shipped with go any longer. Is there a version that handles generics > and if so where can I find it? A quick search of github came up empty but I > know things have been moved around so some hints would be much appreciated. > > > > I'm not in favor of the fact, but It's been deprecated a year ago: > > https://github.com/golang/go/issues/49212 > > one can use godocs.io for a maintained "godoc-like" binary: > > - https://godocs.io/go-hep.org/x/hep/sliceop > - https://sr.ht/~sircmpwn/godocs.io/ > > (otherwise, 'go doc' does support "generics") > > hth, > -s > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/d5612970-6ad5-4e47-a45e-1e61f9cb648an%40googlegroups.com.
