Hello,

I'm trying out the go1.18beta2 by attempting to move from codegen based 
generics using a custom tool to 1.18's type parameters. I looked 
extensively for examples and others trying to do something similar but 
found little. I figured out a working way to do this but it seems extensive.

I'm trying to have a generic field on a struct(UpdateModelRequest) which is 
a *T so that the struct can be read from json and then processed. A few 
methods or fields need to be exposed so that you can interact with the 
generic field from UpdateModelRequest's methods. I also need to be able to 
check if this generic field is left nil.

I was able to get this to work but I'm curious if it could be simplified at 
all as it seems complicated to require two type parameters for this. I 
figured this out after trying to follow the `pointer method` 
<https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/8b5daebee3198c7b6265b40c06b077be5e4c5b4b/design/43651-type-parameters.md>
 section 
from the generics proposal. It seems to be written for a slightly different 
use case though.

Working, but complicated(requires two type params): 
https://gotipplay.golang.org/p/iz2GKYtaL-A

Basically I do not understand why you can't do a simpler single type 
parameter version using comparable directly within DataRecord. I know the 
spec says comparable cannot be used as a variable, or value(and I presume 
this means a struct field too) but it works with the two type parameter 
redirection above. I'd like to know why the two parameter version works for 
some reason.

Single type parameter version: https://gotipplay.golang.org/p/UO8e6zQwi0k


My research/help others find this. I could not find much for people trying 
to do something similar even though it seems a common use case(we have many 
different data types that need basic crud http handlers):

>From reading the 1.18 spec it says you can't embed `comparable` types as a 
variable or value. I assume this means you also can't use as a struct 
field. I'm not sure why you can't do this or if it's just a limitation for 
now. Are you expected to add an `IsNil() bool` method as a replacement for 
this?

>From the spec re comparable type parameter(Record field in example) as a 
struct field:
https://tip.golang.org/ref/spec#Type_constraints

"They cannot be the types of values or variables, or components of other, 
non-interface types."

If you try to use a pointer field(line 12) to make the record comparable 
then you get this error.

"req.Record.SetID undefined (type *Record is pointer to type parameter, not 
type parameter)"

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/4b4ce168-64fd-4534-9925-989b1371a32bn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to