On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 5:43 AM quin...@gmail.com <quint...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Has anyone got any experience of high performance image processing in go?
>
> By this I mean doing complex image processing in real time at 4K
> resolution on commodity hardware. This is really pushing it using carefully
> written C++ but when we tried writing similar code using go slices we go a
> significant slowdown (x4 over gcc).
>
> We experimented using unsafe pointers thinking it is go's slice range
> checking that cause the problems, but surprisingly saw no improvement.
>
> Has anyone had success saturating the memory bandwidth using go?  Is my
> result a surprise to people? Is it just that gcc's code generator is very
> mature and Go's is less so, or should I keep looking for dropoffs in my
> code?
>
This doesn't particularly surprise me. The Go GC compiler is optimised for
fast compile-times and does very limited vectorization.

I think the general advice in cases where one needs better optimization
paths has been to use gccgo or gollvm (if possible).


>
> I haven't looked at the generated assembly yet, but that is my next step.
>
> Any opinions?
>
> -Steve
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/8419a816-8058-48c1-874b-09a34be0f3fcn%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/8419a816-8058-48c1-874b-09a34be0f3fcn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CANrC0Bgua02tU4h1QayM%2BHVmOWNznKnYiSdzFTsKkUT_wVZNYw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to