Wow, sounds great!
Really looking forward to this feature!
在 2021年4月28日 +0800 PM12:22,Ian Lance Taylor <i...@golang.org>,写道:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 8:26 PM Pure White <wu.purewh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think this is a good idea. But I suppose this will meet the same problem 
> > I have met ---- syscall package is outside of the runtime.
>
> We can introduce hooks into the runtime that are only for the standard
> library, because we know exactly how they will be used.
>
> Ian
>
>
>
> > 在2021年4月28日星期三 UTC+8 上午12:54:25<Michael Pratt> 写道:
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if calling through the VDSO is the best solution to this 
> > > specific issue, though it does sound like a case that would certainly 
> > > benefit.
> > >
> > > Regardless, one fairly clean way we could support this would be to make 
> > > x/sys/unix.ClockGettime (and Gettimeofday) call through the VDSO rather 
> > > than performing the syscall. That is always a valid operation (the VDSO 
> > > will make the syscall if it doesn't support the specific options passed), 
> > > and I think would solve this problem without even changing the API. It 
> > > seems we don't do that already for simplicity of implementation and prior 
> > > lack of need.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 12:13 PM Ian Lance Taylor <ia...@golang.org> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021, 8:55 AM Manlio Perillo <manlio....@gmail.com> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Il giorno martedì 27 aprile 2021 alle 17:51:46 UTC+2 Ian Lance Taylor 
> > > > > ha scritto:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 7:43 AM Manlio Perillo 
> > > > > > <manlio....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Il giorno lunedì 26 aprile 2021 alle 10:24:09 UTC+2 Pure White ha 
> > > > > > > scritto:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So I really want to know what is the right way to do vdso call 
> > > > > > > > outside runtime?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What about using a different function instead of time.Now, and 
> > > > > > > using RawSyscall?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That wouldn't be a VDSO call. VDSO calls are in general faster than
> > > > > > system calls. There is more background at
> > > > > > https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/vdso.7.html.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ian
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, that wouldn't a VDSO call. But since a VDSO call will require 
> > > > > cgo , maybe RawSyscall will be more efficient?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The meaningful comparison is to time.Now, which uses VDSO. I suppose it 
> > > > is possible that RawSyscall of clock_gettime with a coarse clock would 
> > > > be faster than time.Now, but I would be surprised.
> > > >
> > > > Ian
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > > Groups "golang-nuts" group.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> > > > an email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com.
> > > >
> > > > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAOyqgcX9mfSFq5gucrTCi0PJyVdLzA2xGXNByDeOGOyaFLo1hA%40mail.gmail.com.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "golang-nuts" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/a57afc3e-a91a-4564-b540-dce9ff0e2429n%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/e350ffd1-7f5e-4fed-b816-17b338c4c28a%40Spark.

Reply via email to