On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 4:18 PM Bruno Albuquerque <b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> FWIIW, I also agree that "ignore" makes no sense here. You might listen and > think about several opinions/options and conclude that one of them is the > best one. This does not mean you ignored all the others. You do not ignore the differing opinions before you make the decision. The decision makes them ignored because you cannot not ignore them. If you would still consider them you cannot make the decision. The decision outcome of whether to adopt generics or not adopt generics is _binary_, hence why I knowingly use "ignore" and it means exactly what it says. Kinda Sophie's choice, if you will. The process of reaching the decision, OTOH, does not ignore arguments/opinions. That I've never said and I don't know why it would be inferred by anyone. Last attempt to clarify: You cannot please all the parties at the same time with this kind of decision, one must realize/admit that's a non-goal. However, from the POV of someone from the "losing" side, his/her argument can be legitimely, but subjectively perceived as ignored - even when it was not actually ignored during the process. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAA40n-U72Uk9xU3hppRsyZiGT_YUYOMRjKkeXsczNbCY%2B2H-oQ%40mail.gmail.com.
