Sorry, I have to walk that back - my test code was wrong, you are correct,
compilation fails.
The point still stands - they require 1.16, so they set that, not 1.15.
Either way - compilation will fail, why does it matter if it fails because
`embed` doesn't exist before 1.16, or whether it fails because `//go:embed`
is not supported before 1.16?

On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:42 PM Axel Wagner <axel.wagner...@googlemail.com>
wrote:

> There would be no advantage to that - all features are either available,
> or not available, depending on which version you use. There is no "go 1.16
> without `embed`". It also needs to be set in `go.mod`, because you might
> compile modules written for different go versions into one binary - so
> which language version to use is part of the module description.
> So, no. Putting a language version into `go.mod` seems to be exactly the
> right way to do this.
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 12:21 PM tapi...@gmail.com <tapir....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> BTW, I think the embedding functionality introduced in Go 1.16 should not
>> be viewed as a feature.
>> It should be viewed as an API change instead.
>>
>
> I don't understand what you mean by this. There is no intrinsic difference
> between the two. In this particular case, the `embed` package adds an API
> to support a new feature "embedding static files in go binaries".
>
>
>> Now Go projects using embedding and setting go directive verison as v1.15
>> in go.mod fail to compile with Go toolchain 1.16.
>>
>
> They shouldn't do that. If they use `embed`, they require at least go
> 1.16, so they set that.
> I can't reproduce your claim that setting `go 1.15` and using embed will
> fail to compile with a Go 1.16 toolchain. It works fine for me.
>
> IMO, this is unnecessary, for the "//go:embed" directive always requires
>> importing the "embed" package.
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 2, 2021 at 6:14:23 AM UTC-5 tapi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Would be better to use compile flags to control each language features
>>> individually?
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "golang-nuts" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/c8e1bd96-78e2-434a-a0cc-4356382e49fcn%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/c8e1bd96-78e2-434a-a0cc-4356382e49fcn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAEkBMfGn50YTgTNa4GeQd%3DYkRRfHbfUwXmCFfDUwWy9UEm9uPw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to