Hi Andrew, sorry, I got up on the wrong foot today. :-( I didn't mean to insult anyone, especially not jackc, by my statement. I'm sure a lot of work has gone into pgx. I'd like to apologize for that.
I try to keep in mind what you said. P.S.: is this list generally a top-post list? Other mailing lists I subscribed to are generally inline-quoted. Cheers, Paul > On 22. Feb, 2021, at 16:14, Andrew Werner <awerne...@gmail.com> wrote: > > V4 clearly depends in some form or another on the earlier version. This on > its face also is not necessarily bad. At the end of the day here, we’re > talking about an absolutely tiny amount of data. I hear that you’re new. I > hope I’m successful in setting expectations that even 10s of small transitive > dependencies does not indicate a problem and certainly is not “bloated beyond > repair”. What resources are you concerned with? Was the compile time slow? Is > the number of files upsetting? My best guess is absolutely not! Code > depending on other code which is modularity designed to fit together is a > very good thing. Just trust it for now and raise concerns in the context of > problems backed by data. When you start to have a bad time for real rather > than perceived reasons, come back and let us know. > > -Andrew > Paul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/B9338D9E-57A8-4359-8C88-2081D464A6BE%40gmail.com.
