> >> I think the general rule of thumb I find agreeable is "the length of >an >> identifier should be inversely correlated to the distance between its >> declaration and its use". >> >
Loosely correlated, perhaps. I'll be honest. I have always found this advice to be rarely useful. It certainly removes one of the hardest parts of programming from tiny functions and encourages their use but their use should be a consideration, in any case. I still don't see why generic functions can't be as close as possible to standard functions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/96B745EC-FAD4-4F88-A4FD-FC8633289579%40gmail.com.
