Oh, I know it does, as mentioned above. Typically to emulate matrices. My point was that it is still different from a linked list of linked lists.If not time complexity, data locality etc. May be useful for some type of very large graph datastructures, I wouldn,'t know since I haven't encountered this use case yet. If many other people have felt the need for list of lists then I would be enlightened.
Also, just pointing out that having higher-order functions easily created at compile time for generic code is nice but we also have interfaces which could alleviate part of the issue. In the end, I am sure you have more data points than I have, my questions have been mostly answered, I'll leave the rest in your care. Cheers, On Thursday, January 21, 2021 at 1:09:23 AM UTC+1 Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM atd...@gmail.com <atd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have been asking because the List of List example seemed a bit > contrieved to me. I have seen maps of linked lists or slice of slices for > math stuff but rarely lists of lists.(probably because of the time > complexity) > > We will have to disagree on that. A list of lists of int is no more > contrived than a type like [][]byte, which is a type that appears at > least 50 times in the Go standard library. > > Ian > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/d51f545b-59af-41dd-bf38-b4a7afe65714n%40googlegroups.com.
