On 1/13/21 11:17 AM, Axel Wagner wrote: > Assuming generics like interfaces, potentially erode type safety. > > > Can you elaborate? Because that statement seems exactly contrary to > established > wisdom.
Clearly Go without interfaces, especially an empty interface is safer. Perhaps Generics reduce that risk via constraints etc.? > How many security issues and/or production panics to date might have been > avoided by avoiding interface use all together? > > > I assume panics in production are sufficiently common Really. If you avoid interfaces and pointers. Is it even possible to panic...maybe with channels. I don't use exceptions personally. Perhaps that is what you mean? I'm not trolling or anything. I just feel that a risk analysis section by those that understand all the details, might be useful to people, before deciding on a thumbs up or down? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/5274cf02-a9a7-357d-e498-b979c1b02f15%40gmail.com.
