Like every other feature from Go. Think channels and goroutines. Or the reflect package. Or the unsafe one. Or big large fat interfaces. Or the empty interface.
-------- Original Message -------- On Dec 24, 2020, 11:42, wilk wrote: > On 24-12-2020, Marcin Romaszewicz wrote: > >> Generics would allow for writing less code, and re-using it more. As long >> as it doesn't complicate the base language, why not? You don't have to use >> them :) > > The only problem with Generics is when it will be abused. Maybe never, > how to know ? > > The current draft has double sides. On one side it's really simple in the > way of Go, which is amazing for generic ! But on the other side, > because it'll be easy to use it can be abused. > > -- > wilk > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/rs1rb2%246mc%241%40ciao.gmane.io. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/fi5iSeAM5T3on2uOHdUsyPZDjQuW-umnfAvrN67HfiyljHQ_yAtIa2Tew6dquQgf02-f5czlO47REATj2I-vURfWZauQ3KPOjU1TuTmDR-M%3D%40sbinet.org.
